A seasoned lifestyle journalist with a passion for luxury trends and cultural analysis, contributing to elite publications worldwide.
"I'll remain in the same office by 2027," Starmer remarked, noting that if our discussion proceeded smoothly, he might welcome us into Downing Street for a follow-up conversation in 2026.
For a PM, there's never truly downtime for leaders. Just an hour before the interview began, Sir Keir had been speaking with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and trying to understand precisely had transpired in Venezuela, where his big ally, US President Donald Trump, had recently launched a strike against and detained its leader, Nicolás Maduro.
Once our lengthy talk, which was much longer than usual, had concluded, Maduro had been formally accused in New York.
But as the year starts, Starmer seems to have had something of a revitalisation. Maybe even just some a rest with the family at Chequers, the prime minister's official country residence.
This seemed to have left him in better spirits than at the saggy conclusion of 2025, a awful annus horribilis for him.
Yet, are he and his colleagues deluding themselves if they believe his standing are poised to improve?
The grisly truth for the prime minister is that many of his fellow MPs believe he's ineffective at his job. A faction of them would sooner take a risk and oust him this year.
But Starmer was dismissing such talk when we spoke on Saturday morning.
Repeatedly he insisted he'd be "assessed at the poll", maintaining nobody would take his term from him – despite the fact that the best chance of halting Nigel Farage and Reform UK entering No 10 could be for Labour to replace leader.
"This is the battle of our lifetime and I intend to lead us," he affirmed.
The issue for the PM is that he will be judged long before then – in a major set of elections in May throughout the UK. He tried to contend, perhaps excessively, that they are about who runs local authorities, and who runs the devolved administrations in Holyrood or Cardiff – and not about Westminster.
True – up to a point. But although he may not want to acknowledge it, No 10 will be judged by those elections too.
This did not stop Sir Keir implying that there were no situation under which he would walk away, even if a his colleagues contested his leadership for the job, should those elections prove catastrophic for Labour.
He tried to explain his low poll ratings by saying the voters was understandably impatient for things to improve. He aimed to persuade the interviewer, and the nation, that the coming months would be distinct.
The economic situation would strengthen despite rising unemployment, he argued, when plans the administration put in place during their initial turbulent year began to take effect.
His central point is that soon the country will "see an improvement".
The prime minister may have communicated with renewed vitality than I've seen from him for a some time – calmer, maybe, with more time to talk.
However, in spite of encountering calls from various quarters for a bolder approach, with increased political clarity, more dynamism, more pace and more immediacy, his explanations were repeated ones.
When he finds himself in this much political peril, does he need a different script?
No administration, and especially not one that has been struggling in the polls for many months, has everything its as planned.
Sir Keir's challenges are not only because government is difficult, but because he and his colleagues have made mistakes, including in the recent past.
The prime minister expressed regret that he was sorry for saying he was "delighted" to welcome back the Egyptian-British activist Alaa Abd El Fattah to the UK following an backlash when statements he'd previously made – such as calls for Zionists and police to be killed – resurfaced.
Starmer blamed "the system" for not realising what the activist had said before – a fancier way of saying it wasn't his responsibility.
And he is inviting clear political dangers as the year unfolds. His friendship with the US president acquires a new jeopardy after Trump's military action on Venezuela.
Based on years of interviewing Sir Keir Starmer, a ex- human rights lawyer who opposed the war in Iraq, over many years, the thought he would be comfortable with these events seems implausible.
He stated he was a "career-long champion of international law" but we "just lack the full picture at the moment".
Critics called for him to condemn it before the interview. And the government is likely to face further scrutiny to give an clear view in Parliament in the near future.
There has also consistently been simmering desire in the Labour ranks to revisit some of the results of Brexit.
The PM disputes he's heading in that direction, but his new specific pledge to align more closely with the European trading bloc – the vast economic European trading zone – will likely trigger howls that he is breaking his vow never to try to overturn the choices that flowed from Brexit.
A move to cosy up to more of the single market will delight some on his own side, but it is simple material for Reform and the Conservatives to
A seasoned lifestyle journalist with a passion for luxury trends and cultural analysis, contributing to elite publications worldwide.